Legal Opinion
Harris v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 30, 2003No. 1:01-CV-00428PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for National Class Certification (doc. 70), Abbott Defendants’ Response in Opposition (doc. 92), Purdue Defendants’ Response in Opposition (doc. 93), and Plaintiffs’ Reply (doc. 96). The Court held a hearing in this matter on September 18, 2003.
I. Background
This case concerns OxyContin, a federally controlled Schedule II prescription medication, approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the relief of moderate to severe pain. The drug is manufactured by Defendants Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lloyd D. Alkire v. Judge Jane IrvingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Michael Sutton v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc., and St. Jude Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Howland v. Purdue Pharma L.P.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
- Sutton v. St. Jude Med IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005