Legal Opinion

Nudd v. Fuller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1928No. 21506. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal herein and affirm the judgment, on the ground and for the reason that the notice of appeal was not served or filed within the time limited by law. Pinal judgment was signed, filed and entered on April 3, 1928. Notice of appeal was served and filed on May 4, 1928.

Section 1 of Rule X of this court, adopted January 14, 1927, and published in 140 Wash., p. xxxv, provides:

“In civil actions and proceedings an appeal from any final judgment must be taken within thirty days after the day of the entry of such final judgment; . . .” (Rem. 1927 Sup., § 308-10).

P…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Foster-Wyman Lumber Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Neis v. PoolWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Lindsay v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Mathison v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. B. F. Hibbard & Co. v. MortonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. In the Matter of Marriage of LemonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  3. MacKey v. ChamplinWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Snider v. RhodesWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Roethler v. St. Martins Mineral Springs Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API