Legal Opinion

Roethler v. St. Martins Mineral Springs Hotel Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1929No. 22030. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff, a stockholder in defendant, St. Martins Mineral Springs Hotel Co., a corporation, brought this action seeking certain equitable relief to which she claimed to be entitled by reason of her own ership of the stock above referred to. Defendants John Wilkinson and Katherine Haines were also interested in the corporation above named, the former as a stockholder and the latter as secretary. Ship-herds Hot Springs, a corporation, intervened by leave of court and filed a separate answer to plaintiff’s complaint. The trial resulted in a decree denying plaintiff the relief which she sought,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nudd v. FullerWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Davidson v. National Can Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. B. F. Hibbard & Co. v. MortonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex. Rel. Dept. F.B. B. v. Thurston Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State ex rel. Department of Finance, Budget & Business v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API