Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 4, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

The appellant, Clarence McKinney, and Koy Prince were indicted by the Knox county grand' jury in which they were jointly accused with maliciously shooting and wounding Cecil Hale with, the intent to kill him, but from which he did not die — an offense created and punished by Section 1166 of Baldwin’s 1936 Revision of Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes. At appellant’s separate trial thereunder he was convicted and punished by confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years. (We observe, however, that the judgment pronounced thereon and from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mulligan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
  2. Watkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Bradley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Maggard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Smiddy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anello v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  2. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Gregoire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. Seward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  5. Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API