Legal Opinion

Maggard v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 22, 1935PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

Kermit Maggard and Claud Maggard were charged with the crime of grand larceny by an indictment returned by the grand jury of Leslie county, alleged to have been committed by unlawfully and feloniously stealing, taking, and carrying away eight head of cat.tle of the value of $200, the personal property of Jasper Baker, with the felonious intent to convert the same to their own use and permanently deprive Baker thereof.. The indictment does not charge the cattle were so taken “without the consent, or against the will,” of Baker.. On a trial…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Patterson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  2. Lickliter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Patterson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  4. Hudspeth v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Allensworth v. Allensworth'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Drake v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  2. McKinney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Duncan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
  4. Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Blusinsky v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API