State v. . Patton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.
The defendant assigns as error certain rulings of the court below relating to the admission of testimony, but upon examination we find the exceptions without substantial merit. The motion for judgment as of nonsuit was properly denied.
The statute for violation of which this defendant was convicted, C. S., 4310, was amended by ch. 258, Public Laws 1941, but the language defining the acts made unlawful, as charged in the warrant, was unchanged. The original statute applied only to McDowell and certain other counties. The amendment made the provisions of the act statewide, but applicable “only…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PallottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Huff v. HuffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- State v. . CalcuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Nichols v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Patton v. State of North CarolinaDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1966
- State v. StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. LowryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.