Corley v. Rowe
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
This is a paternity action initiated by Kathy Ann C. Corley, the respondent, against Heber Rowe, the appellant. The trial court found that Rowe was the father of Penelope Dawn Corley and ordered him to pay $50 weekly child support. Rowe raises three issues on appeal. First, Rowe alleges that the trial court accorded too much weight to the results of a Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) blood test. Second, Rowe asserts that he rebutted Corley’s prima facie case and the trial court erred in failing to make such a finding. And third, Rowe assigns error to the trial court’s judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Atkinson v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
- Spires v. HigginsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Peebles v. DisherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
- Major v. MajorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McKissick v. J.F. Cleckley & Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Millis v. MillisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Sauls v. SaulsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Bradley v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Hudson v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.