Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Bradley

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 26, 1985No. 0425PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

The family court ordered respondent Jospeh Todd Bradley to pay appellant Jane 0. Bradley child support and alimony. This appeal raises three questions: whether the court abused its discretion in failing to award additional child support and alimony, and in failing to award attorney’s fees. We affirm as modified.

This being an equity action tried by one judge, we have jurisdiction to determine the issues in accordance with our own view of the preponderance of the evidence Barden v. Barden, 278 S. C. 672, 301 S. E. (2d) 141 (1983). The issues of how much child support and alimony…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. Lide v. LideSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Peebles v. DisherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  5. Barden v. BardenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Woodside v. WoodsideCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Sauls v. SaulsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Casey v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Rabon v. RabonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Patterson v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API