Legal Opinion
State v. Roberts
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 14, 1989No. 71441PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
A jury convicted appellant of prostitution, a violation of Sections 567.010(2) and 567.020, RSMo 1986. This direct appeal charges that the statutes under which the jury convicted appellant violate the federal and state constitutional guarantees of free speech. U.S. Const. amend. I; Mo. Const. art. I, § 8. We have exclusive appellate jurisdiction. Mo. Const, art. V, § 3. Affirmed.
I
Officer Timothy Gee, a detective with the Kansas City, Missouri, Police Department, worked the “prostitution detail” on the day of Roberts’ arrest. According to Gee’s un-controverted testimony at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- State v. VollmarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Erotic Service Provider Legal Education & Research Project v. GasconCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. v. City of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- State v. PribbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- State v. BlakeburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.