Legal Opinion

State v. Vollmar

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 8, 1965No. 50458PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMAN, Judge.

Defendant was charged with and found guilty of the offense of knowingly possessing certain obscene publications with intent to sell and circulate the same and the jury fixed his punishment at a fine of $1,000. See § 563.280, Laws of Mo. 1961, p. 335, and V.A.M.S. He has appealed from the ensuing judgment.

We have jurisdiction of this appeal (although the offense is a misdemeanor) because questions have been presented which involve the construction of certain constitutional provisions. Mo.Const. Art. V, § 3 (1945), V.A.M.S.

The State’s evidence will support the following statement…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Williams v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. State v. FlynnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Flack v. Municipal Court for the Anaheim-Fullerton Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API