Legal Opinion

State v. Pribble

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 26, 2009No. SC 89473PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

Jacob Pribble (“Defendant”) challenges the constitutional validity of section 566.151, RSMo Supp.2008, 1 pursuant to which he was convicted of attempted enticement of a child. He was sentenced to six years imprisonment. He argues that the statute is unconstitutional because it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, is vague, encroaches on protected speech, and went into effect pursuant to an invalid emergency clause.

This Court has exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3, of the Missouri Constitution in that Defendant challenges the constitutional…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. Robert Owen BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Burnett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. FaruqiSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  4. Goins v. GoinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. Willbanks v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API