Heaven v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PRADO, Circuit Judge:
Before us is a petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which affirmed the determination of an immigration judge that the petitioner was not eligible to apply for cancellation of removal on the basis of the stop-time rule. Because the BIA correctly decided that the stop-time rule may be applied retroactively to the petitioner’s pre-1996 convictions and because we lack jurisdiction over the petitioner’s remaining claims, we DENY the petition in part and DISMISS it in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Petitioner Dervin Venion…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Omari v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Massis v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Cheng Chen v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Martinez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Tanuja-Sahai v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.