Legal Opinion

Roth v. Hurd

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1940No. Appeal, 15PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is an action in trespass brought by plaintiffs against defendant to recover damages to plaintiffs’ automobile, sustained in a right-angle collision at a street intersection between plaintiffs’ automobile, operated by Alice H. Roth, one of the plaintiffs, and the automobile owned and operated by defendant. To plaintiffs’ statement of claim defendant filed an answer and counterclaim for the damages sustained by her automobile. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs and against defendant in the sum of $330.70, and on the counterclaim a verdict in favor of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Byrne v. Schultz (Stone)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Adams v. GardinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Altomari v. KrugerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Rhinehart v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. McNulty v. Joseph Horne Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCormick Transportation Co. v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Schall v. Penn Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Glennon v. OstroffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Brown v. McNamaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Ksiazek v. PelleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API