Commonwealth v. Schmidt

OPINION BY

POPOVICH, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant Nathan G. Schmidt appeals from an order entered on October 26, 2005, in the Court of Common Pleas, Union County, denying his motion to dismiss criminal information. Upon review, we affirm the October 26, 2005 order.

¶ 2 The facts and procedural history are stated as follows. On June 25, 2003, the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General interrogated Christine Brumbach in con*243nection with a conspiracy to deliver controlled substances. Ms. Brumbach implicated Appellant in this conspiracy and, consequently, on September 17, 2003, the 19th Statewide Investigating…