Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Naugle

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1990No. 88A01-8910-CV-426PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Denver and Carol Johnson appeal the judgment of the trial court finding them liable to Thomas and Barbara Naugle for the cost of repairing certain defects in the property known as “Holland House” purchased by the Naugles from the Johnsons. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

In the fall of 1987, Barbara and Thomas Naugle, having decided to move from their home in Arizona, visited various properties in Lawrence and Monroe Counties in Indiana. One such property was the home of Denver and Carol Johnson which was known as…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Posner v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Captain & Co., Inc. v. StenbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Bals v. VerduzcoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Smith v. BeatyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Harco, Inc. of Indianapolis v. Plainfield Interstate Family Dining AssociatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Nance v. Miami Sand & Gravel, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API