Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Esch v. Lake County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1991No. 90-2142PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

We are asked to decide in this appeal if the title requirement in R.C. 731.31 must be met with strict compliance. For the reasons that follow, we hold that it must and, therefore, that the board of elections has a clear duty to reject the instant noncomplying petition. Moreover, because the board does not argue that Esch has a plain and adequate remedy at law, we further hold that the court of appeals properly granted Esch a writ of mandamus.

R.C. 731.31 provides, in pertinent part:

“Any initiative or referendum petition may be presented in separate parts, but each part of any initiative…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Stern v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State ex rel. Chevalier v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State ex rel. Burech v. Belmont County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Beck v. CaseyOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Thurn v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Becker v. City of EastlakeOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Citizens for Responsible Taxation v. Scioto County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Tam O'Shanter Co. v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State ex rel. Becker v. EastlakeOhio Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API