Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Meyer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1981No. 13289PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Chet Sherman (appellant) appeals from an order granting appellees’ motion to dismiss. We affirm.

Appellees, Donald and Audrey Meyer, had hired a contractor, Russell Johnson, to do work on their property. Johnson subcontracted work to appellant who filed a mechanic’s lien for his work. In accordance with SDCL 44-9-26, appellees demanded foreclosure of the lien. Appellant counterclaimed for services and goods sold and delivered in the amount of his lien. Appellant released his mechanic’s lien and the court entered an order dismissing appellees’ complaint with prejudice and appellant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McLaughlin Electric Supply v. American Empire Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ringgenberg v. WilmsmeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Keeley Lumber and Coal Co. v. DunkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. A.P. & Sons Construction v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Amert Construction Co. v. SpielmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. A.P. & Sons Construction v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Larson Concrete Co. v. StroscheinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Larson Concrete Co. v. StroscheinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API