Legal Opinion · Dissent

Larson Concrete Co. v. Stroschein

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1984No. 14187Published

1DissentFosheim, Chief Justice

The majority opinion holds the supplier must apply payments from the contractor to materials furnished a particular property for the owner’s benefit. This greatly exposes only open-account suppliers and diminishes their protection under the mechanic’s lien statute. See, SDCL ch. 44-9. Thus, open-account suppliers will be required to either: 1) complete all necessary steps delineated in SDCL ch. 44-9 to perfect their mechanic’s liens and inquire for application the source of each payment received from contractors or 2) utilize the procedures outlined in the direct billing statute. See, SDCL…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lytle v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. F. M. Slagle & Co. v. BushnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Dolder v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. McLaughlin Electric Supply v. American Empire Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Ringgenberg v. WilmsmeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API