Legal Opinion

Ringgenberg v. Wilmsmeyer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1977No. 11769, 11855PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINANS, Justice.*

This controversy involves the proper application of our mechanics’ lien statutes, SDCL 44-9. Defendants George and Marjorie Tarver are owners as joint tenants of the old Gamble building in Aberdeen, South Dakota.1 In October, 1973 they sold their interest in that property to defendant Melvin S. Wilmsmeyer, pursuant to a Contract for Deed. The contract was drawn by *199George Tarver. It has never been recorded in the office of the Brown County Register of Deeds.

The Contract for Deed required a $15,-000.00 down payment and a further lump sum payment of $20,573.60 in January, 1974;…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Guldberg v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Crescent Electric Supply Co. v. NerisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Thurston v. Cedric Sanders CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Utschig v. McCloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Action Mechanical, Inc. v. Deadwood Historic Preservation CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sepco, Inc. v. Valley State Bank (In Re Sepco, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1984
  3. Bollinger v. EldredgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. DFA Dairy Financing Services, L.P. v. Lawson Special TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Ask, Inc. v. WegerleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API