Legal Opinion

Allan-Macmaster Co. v. Exterstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1932No. Docket No. 4565PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This action was prosecuted by plaintiff against appellant in her proper person and also as the executrix of the last will and testament of H. J. Exterstein, deceased. The purpose of the action was to have restored to the estate of said decedent certain assets out of which to pay debts of the estate. Judgment was for plaintiff and this appeal follows.

The grounds upon which appellant urges a reversal include the sufficiency of the evidence.

The property sought to be restored to decedent’s estate consists entirely of the shares of stock of certain corporations. The trial court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Forde v. Exempt Fire Co.California Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Federal Construction Co. v. BradyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Chapman v. Associated Transit Terminal Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liuzza v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Abbey v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API