Legal Opinion

Federal Construction Co. v. Brady

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1932No. Docket No. 8193PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

The action is to foreclose a claim of. lien resulting from the performance of certain street improvement work.

Plaintiff received judgment and defendant appeals. It will be unnecessary to detail the facts inasmuch as it is not our province to demonstrate why or how the judgment of the trial court was correct. The entire appeal is based upon the claim that the court below erroneously determined a conflict of fact, and in support of the appeal great stress is laid upon the provisions of section 4%, article VI, of the Constitution and section 956a of the Code of Civil…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Khoury v. BarhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Barham v. KhouryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Allan-Macmaster Co. v. ExtersteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Snokelberg v. CreceliusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API