In re B.B.P.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from an order adjudicating B.B.P. a neglected child. Appellant J.P., the child’s mother, claims that this ruling was erroneous because the District of Columbia filed its neglect petition too soon. The District argues that even if the petition was premature, the mother’s conduct between the time of the child’s birth and the neglect hearing justified the *1020court’s ultimate decision. Because we conclude that the petition was timely, we affirm.
I
The pertinent facts are not in dispute. Late in November of 1996, J.P. moved to the District of Columbia from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Varela v. Hi-Lo Powered Stirrups, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re Dom. LSDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re W.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Gause v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re BBPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re WMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004