Legal Opinion

In re T.M.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1995No. 92-FS-1576PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGNER, Chief Judge:

This appeal arises out of a proceeding initiated on behalf of T.M., a minor child, by her guardian ad litem seeking termination of the parental rights of the child’s mother, K.M., and two named putative fathers, J.C. and D.J. The trial court terminated the parental rights of the mother, but denied the petition with respect to the putative fathers “for lack of proof.” Although the trial court’s order does not elaborate further .upon the basis for its ruling with respect to the named putative fathers, the transcript of the proceedings reveals that the trial court declined to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Appeal of H.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Teachey v. CarverDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. In re C.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. In re T.J.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. In re B.B.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. In re C.V.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API