Legal Opinion
In re W.M.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 3, 2004No. 01-SP-683, 01-SP-684, 01-SP-725, 01-SP-726, 01-SP-739, 01-SP-744, 01-SP-748, 01-SP-824, 01-SP-848, 01-SP-852PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
The District of Columbia Sex Offender Registration Act of 1999 (“SORA”), D.C.Code §§ 22-4001 through 22-4017 (2001), imposes registration requirements on sex offenders who live, work, or attend school in the District of Columbia and authorizes the Metropolitan Police Department to inform the community about them through various means of public notification, including posting their photographs, names, and other personal information on the Internet. In the past decade every state in the United States has enacted such a sex offender registration and notification law,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- John Doe I v. Robert WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Anderson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- JJF v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. DurapauColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.