Legal Opinion

Lorenz v. Booth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1915No. 12261PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered April 3, 1913, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action for malpractice, tried to a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff seeks recovery of damages from the defendant, a practicing physician of Seattle, claimed to be the result of his negligence in the treatment of the plaintiff’s broken leg. Upon the trial, at the close of the evidence introduced on behalf of plaintiff, counsel for the defendant moved the court to withdraw the case from the jury and render judgment in his favor, upon the ground that the evidence introduced in the plaintiff’s behalf was insufficient to *551call for the submission of the case to the jury. This motion was granted, and judgment rendered accordingly. From this disposition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sawdey v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Whitesell v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Wurdemann v. BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hoffman v. WatkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Peterson v. WellsWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Montana Deaconess Hospital v. GrattonMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Fritz v. HorsfallWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Swanson v. HoodWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Schumacher v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Dahl v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API