Dahl v. Wagner
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered April 7, 1914, in favor of the dedendant, notwithstanding the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for malpractice.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
At about sis o’clock in the evening of March 8, 1913, plaintiff, a workman in a logging camp, was injured by a log rolling on his foot. The defendant having the contract to treat the men under the hospital fee system, arrived at the scene of the accident about eleven o’clock and brought plaintiff to'the hospital, which they reached at about one-thirty in the morning. Plaintiff’s hurts consisted of a dislocation of one of the cuneiform bones of the foot and two cuts or wounds in the top of the foot. As described in the complaint and generally supported by the testimony, “a log which he was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wharton v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Wells v. Ferry-Baker Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Sawdey v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Mickelson v. FischerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Lorenz v. BoothWashington Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hood v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Fritz v. HorsfallWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Swanson v. HoodWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Kelly v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Dishman v. Northern Pacific Beneficial Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1917
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.