Zeglin v. Tetzlaff
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $5,000 paid for the purchase price of certain stock. The separate demurrer of Northwestern Marble & Tile Company was sustained, and the separate demurrer of Eugene Tetzlaff was overruled, Waite, J. The case was tried before Fish, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for $5,706.88. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, Eugene Tetzlaff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
1. In December, 1914, plaintiff purchased from defendant 44 shares of stock in the Northwest Marble & Tile Company. Plaintiff claims that he was induced by fraud to make the purchase.and that he rescinded the purchase, and he brought this action to recover the price paid. Plaintiff had a verdict. Defendant appeals.
Defendant was president of the company. Charles N. Gramling was its secretary. Plaintiff was well acquainted with both and had on several occasions loaned defendant money on his unsecured note. Plaintiff’s evidence tends to prove the following:
On November 4, 1914, Gramling wrote…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parsons v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Brown v. California & Western Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Sweet v. LowrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Nicolay v. MallerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Arcade Investment Co. v. HawleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zuber v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Bakke v. KellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Hemming v. Ald, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- United States Installment Realty Co. v. DeLancy Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Stanton v. Morris Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.