Legal Opinion
Quinones Rodriguez v. Andoxx Corp.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided July 31, 2006No. Civil 05-1821(DRD)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DOMINGUEZ, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is co-defendant MAPFRE Life Insurance Company’s (“MAPFRE”) Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. (Docket No. 24). Through said motion, MAPFRE moves the Court to dismiss all of plaintiffs ERISA and COBRA claims provided that: (1) MAPFRE is not the plan administrator responsible for notifying plaintiff of his continuation rights under COBRA after his termination from employment, and (2) MAPFRE cannot be held liable for a breach of fiduciary duty premised upon a responsibility to provide COBRA notification when such duty falls…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ramon M. Suarez v. Pueblo International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Cadle Co. v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arroyo-Ruiz v. Triple-S Management GroupDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017
- Agosto v. ACADEMIA SAGRADO CORAZONDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
- Irizarry-Robles v. Guillermo RodriguezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Aguila-AvilesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2025
- Rosario Ramos v. Municipality of Rio GrandeDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021