Legal Opinion · Dissent
Barrett v. MacDonald
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 21, 1963No. 38,250Published
1DissentMurphy, Justice
It seems to me that all of the material facts in this case were fully considered and the controlling principles of law correctly applied in the original opinion of Mr. Justice Frank T. Gallagher.1 Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
The opinion of Mr. Justice Frank T. Gallagher read in part as follows:
“1. In her appeal to this court appellant sets out 36 assignments of error, several of which attack the findings of the trial court as not being sustained by the evidence. No motion was made for a new trial. Where there is no motion for a new trial this court is limited, on appeal from a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Olson v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Chase v. WhittenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- McClure v. BruckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Lewis v. WilloughbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Potvin v. PotvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.