McClure v. Bruck
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by pláintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Young, J., presiding, (before whom the case was tried without a jury,) vacating and setting aside the findings of fact, con- ' elusions of law, and judgment, and substituting new findings and conclusions and a new order for judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This was an action of ejectment, and was tried by the court without a jury, and upon his findings judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff, January 10, 1888. It was the intention of the court in ordering judgment for the plaintiff to award him the property described ill the complaint, which corresponded with the description in the deeds 'under which he acquired and claimed title. At the suggestion of the court, plaintiff’s attorney drew up findings, which the court signed, supposing that the' description therein conformed to the complaint and evidence. • But, as a matter of fact, the…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Chase v. WhittenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Wilson v. City of Fergus FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Hafner v. HafnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- In Re Estate of SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Hoff v. HoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.