Legal Opinion

QXMedical, LLC v. Vascular Solutions, LLC

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 2, 2019No. 0:17-cv-01969Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA QXMÉDICAL, LLC, Case No. 17‐CV‐1969 (PJS/TNL) Plaintiff, v. ORDER VASCULAR SOLUTIONS, LLC; TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.À.R.L.; and ARROW INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants. Courtland C. Merrill and Philip J. Kaplan, ANTHONY OSTLUND BAER & LOUWAGIE P.A., for plaintiff. J. Thomas Vitt, Emily Justine Tait, Patrick J. O’Rear, and Sanjiv Prakash Laud, JONES DAY; Kenneth E. Levitt, DORSEY & WHITNEY, for defendants. This lawsuit involves six patents—U.S. Patent Nos. 8,048,032 (the “‘032 patent”), 8,142,413 (the “‘413 patent”), RE45,380 (the “RE’380…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Catalina Marketing International, Inc. v. coolsavings.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API