Legal Opinion

Nguyen v. Conner

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 6, 2003No. 9911-12323; A114620PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiffs Nguyen and Vu, who are husband and wife, brought an action to quiet title to a ten-foot-wide strip of real property to which defendant holds title. The trial court found plaintiffs to be the owners of the strip of property through adverse possession. Defendant appeals, raising two assignments of error, both of which challenge the trial court’s ruling in favor of plaintiffs on their claim for adverse possession. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3), and reverse.

The strip of land in question runs along the southerly lot line of defendant’s property. Since defendant first acquired his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Davis v. ParkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Markovich v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Woolfolk v. IslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. UNION CEMETERY OF CRAWFORDSVILLE v. CoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Stone v. CCXL, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API