Legal Opinion
Lowery v. Euverard
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 3, 2007No. 06-6172PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtZatkoff, District Judge, joined by Siler, J.,
GILMAN, J. (pp. 601-06), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the judgment.
OPINION
LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought suit in federal court after they were dismissed from their high school football team. Defendants brought a motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, which the district court denied. On appeal, Defendants argue that Plaintiffs’ dismissal was permissible under the rule governing student speech set forth in Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 89 S.Ct. 733, 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969). For the reasons set forth below, we…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Doninger v. NiehoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Doninger Ex Rel. Doninger v. NiehoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Radwan v. ManuelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Barr v. LafonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- JS Ex Rel. Snyder v. Blue Mountain School Dist.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.