Legal Opinion

Growall v. Maietta

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 2007PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.:

111 Jonathan Growall (“Growall”) appeals from the judgment entered May 23, 2006, in favor of Growall and against Patrick J. Maietta in the amount of $17,548.00. 1 We affirm.

¶ 2 On October 2, 2002, Patrick J. Maiet-ta (“Pat Maietta”) and his wife Katherine Maietta (“Kathy Maietta”) agreed to sell Growall the property located at 1630 Rutherford Street, Pittsburgh, for $80,000, and executed an agreement to that effect. The closing occurred on December 2, 2002. At some point after taking possession of the premises, Growall alleges he discovered a water leakage problem…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bortz v. NoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Gabriel v. O'HARASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Valley Forge Towers South Condominium v. Ron-Ike Foam Insulators, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. LaCourse v. KieselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Harvey v. Rouse Chamberlin, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bennett v. A.T. Masterpiece Homes at Broadsprings, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Stumpf v. NyeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Stange, T. v. Janssen PharmaceuticalsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Wilson v. ParisiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Sovereign Bank v. Gawron, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API