Legal Opinion

Dombeck v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

The following issues are presented by this appeal:(1) Did the trial court err in holding that any negligence of the Railroad Company with respect to lookout was not causal as a matter of law ?(2) Should questions inquiring whether the Railroad Company was causally negligent with respect to speed have been submitted in the special verdict ?(3) Can the jury’s finding apportioning 50 percent of the total aggregate causal negligence to the Railroad Company be sustained on the basis that the jury was thereby finding the railroad causally negligent with respect to speed ?(4) Because of plaintiff…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Pfingsten v. PfingstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Archer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Collegiate Manufacturing Co. v. McDowell's Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Banco De Seguros Del EstadoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Leigh v. LundquistAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Dombeck v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Collegiate Manufacturing Co. v. McDowell's Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API