Delk Realty Corp. v. Rubin
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by landlord from final order in summary proceedings entered on verdict directed by the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, ninth district, in favor of Badish and Holt, alleged under-tenants.
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
The proceeding was based on the ground that the tenant and under-tenants held over the term. The answer of the under-tenants set up a hiring by the Bank for Savings, former owner of the property, to the under-tenants as tenants of the bank for the term beginning February 1, 1920, and expiring January 31, 1922. At the close of the evidence the court, on motion of the tenants’ counsel, directed a verdict in favor of Badish and Holt.
*180On July 17, 1919, the Bank for Savings, being the owner of the premises in question, made a contract with Max Lovett, the assignor of the landlord herein, for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Worrall v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Peabody v. . SpeyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Roskam-Scott Co. v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Roe v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1903
- Salomon v. WeisbergAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959