Legal Opinion

Roe v. Smith

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action to compel specific performance of a contract to sell real estate.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynob, J.:

The will of the deceased devised the land to the defendants as executors in trust with power to sell at the expiration of the trust and distribute the proceeds among the testator’s children. The defendants both, and together, en-> tered into an oral agreement to sell the land, and the contract was reduced to writing at their direction; but when it after-wards came to the signing, the defendant Charles P. Smith did not sign, and was not present at the signing, but he authorized and directed the other defendant to act for him in the signing, and to sign. The contract by its terms…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Briggs v. . PartridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Armor v. FreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. Carter v. HurstMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Dondero v. TurrillasNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Delk Realty Corp. v. RubinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1920
  5. Roe v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API