Legal Opinion
White Co. v. Vita-Var Corporation
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 9, 1950No. Patent Appeals 5663PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision rendered by the Assistant Commissioner of Patents, acting for the Commissioner, in a trade-mark opposition proceeding, 76 US PQ 267.
The decision appealed from reversed the decision of the Examiner of Interferences who, dismissing the notice of opposition of Vita-Var Corporation, held that The White Company was entitled to have registered the word “Hydrolite” as a trade-mark for “Casein Wall Paint,” in the application for registration of which use was asserted “since July 1, 1935.” . • .
The opposition of Vita-Var Corporation, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Pratt & Lambert, Inc. v. Chapman & Rodgers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- Goldsmith Bros. v. Atlas Supply Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Knickerbocker Toy Co. v. Faultless Starch Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Pep Boys-Manny, Moe and Jack v. Edwin F. Guth Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Coca-cola Co. v. Seven-up Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Sprayed Insulation, Inc. v. Sprayo-Flake Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Alligator Co. v. Larus & Brother Co. IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.