Legal Opinion

Goldsmith Bros. v. Atlas Supply Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 9, 1945No. 4998PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

This appeal is from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, 60 USPQ 18, affirming that of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing a notice of opposition filed by appellant to the application of appellee to register its trade mark “Coldex,” written in script, as applied to an automobile antifreeze compound, and adjudging the mark to be registrable.

Both parties took testimony.

It appears that appellant, a corporation, does a mercantile business in the city of New York, in several diversified lines in which the mark “Goldex” is applied to many articles. It operates in its store a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pratt & Lambert, Inc. v. Chapman & Rodgers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Consolidated Cosmetics v. Neilson Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1952
  2. White Co. v. Vita-Var CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Pep Boys-Manny, Moe and Jack v. Edwin F. Guth Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  4. McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. IsenbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  5. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Plastron, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API