Legal Opinion

C. Aultman & Co. v. Martin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1896No. 7246PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the district court of Fillmore county. Tried below before Hastings, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNor val, J.

This is the second appearance of this case in this court, the opinion filed on the former hearing being reported in 37 Neb., 826. The last trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff below in the sum of $150. The defendant has brought the record here for review. The former opinion contains a brief statement of the issues presented by the pleadings and will not be repeated here.

It is developed by the record that Martin, the plaintiff below, was the agent of the defendant at Fairmont in the sale of its machinery during the years 1885 and 1887, under written contracts. In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dodge v. PeopleNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Brooks v. DutcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  3. C. Aultman & Co. v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Walker v. TurnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Brooks v. DutcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Omaha v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Meyer v. ShameNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Kirchman v. KratkyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Williams v. Alaska Commercial Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API