Legal Opinion

Walker v. Turner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Buffalo county. Tried below before Hamer, J. cited : Atkins v. Atkins, 9 Neb., 191; McGavock v. Pollack, 13 Id., 535; Grebe v. Jones, 15 Id., 315; Holmes v. Holmes, Id., 615; Potter v. C. & N. W. Ry. Co., 1 Id., 14; Bishop on Contracts, secs. 185, 187; Winchester v. King, 46 Mich., 102; Bartling v. Behrends, 20 Neb., 211. cited : Crowell v. Galloway, 3 Neb., 220; Kane v. People, 4 Id., 509; Burnham v. Doolittle, 14 Id., 215.

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, Ch. J.

This action was instituted in the district court of Buffalo county, the purpose of which was to recover from plaintiff in error the sum of $2,500, alleged to be due defendant in error for certain services rendered on behalf of plaintiff in error in procuring the adoption of a certain pump to be used in the system of water works constructed for the city of Kearney. The allegations of the petition were substantially that at and prior to the time of the contract which is alleged to have been entered into between plaintiff and defendant the city of Kearney was desirous of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crowell v. GallowayNebraska Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Brooks v. DutcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Omaha v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Speer v. BurlingameMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. C. Aultman & Co. v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Lowe v. RileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Fisher, Sons & Co. v. CrowleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API