Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Shame

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1897No. 7245PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

In this action, instituted in the district court of Lancaster county, it was alleged for cause of action, in the original petition filed, that certain parties, J eróme Shamp, tSfe defendant in error herein, T. B. Dawson, and J. A. Wallingford, constituted a firm or partnership under the name and style of Dawson, Shamp & Co., engaged on and for some time prior to November 9, 1880, in the business of buying and selling agricultural implements, machinery, etc., at Lincoln, and had become and were indebted to persons and firms in the amounts and as specifically set forth in the itemized statement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shamp v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Coquillard v. HoveyNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  3. C. Aultman & Co. v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Meyer v. ShampNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Torrey v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Woolsey v. ZieglarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Atkinson v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Apperson-Lee Motor Co. v. RingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API