Legal Opinion
State v. Anonymous
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided July 1, 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnett, J.
The four defendants in these related cases are charged with either possession of narcotics or possession of narcotics with intent to sell. All defendants have moved to suppress the use in evidence of the narcotics and drug paraphernalia that were seized during a warrant-authorized search of the apartment occupied by H and L.
Two independent grounds are asserted as the basis for suppression. First the defendants contend that the warrant authorizing the search and seizure was “stale” because of a delay in time between its issuance and execution. The second claim is that the manner in which the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
- Junior v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. WashingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Lloyd v. BurtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- People v. ClaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.