Legal Opinion

People v. Clayton

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 1993No. A060064PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

Penal Code section 1534 1 requires that a search warrant be executed “within 10 days after date of issuance.” In this case of first impression in California, we must decide how that 10-day period is to be computed.

I. Facts

At 11 a.m. on July 15, 1992, a magistrate signed a warrant authorizing the search of 4719 Melrose Avenue in Oakland. Police executed the warrant about 5:20 p.m. on July 25, 1992. Inside, the police found the two defendants, Aaron Clayton and Diana Williams, controlled substances and weapons. Criminal charges were filed.

Ruling on defendants’ motion to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Commonwealth v. CromerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Griffith v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. People v. TwedtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shalabi v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Shorty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
  3. People v. Anthony B.California Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API