Legal Opinion
Kirshner v. Goldberg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 15, 1981No. 77 Civ. 665(HFW)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WERKER, District Judge.
This action challenging investment of New York City Teachers’ Retirement funds in obligations of the Municipal Assistance Corporation for the City of New York (“MAC”) is before this Court on motions to dismiss the amended complaint by all defendants except Citibank, N.A.
Plaintiff commenced this action pro se in 1977 against the United States, various federal officials, and Trustees of the Teachers’ Retirement System (“TRS”). The thrust of plaintiff’s complaint centered around an agreement entered into by five New York City pension trusts, including TRS, the City…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jerome Singleton v. City of New York, Ronald Salzer and Anthony DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- IIT v. CornfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Hokama v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1983
- Goldman v. McMahan, Brafman, Morgan & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Zucker v. KatzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Zatkin v. PrimuthDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.