Legal Opinion
Oppenheim v. I.C. System, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided February 18, 2010No. 3:09-cv-00497PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 9), to which Plaintiff has responded in opposition (Dkt. 14). Upon consideration, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Background
Oppenheim brought this action seeking redress for I.C. System, Inc.’s alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., and the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (“FCCPA”), Fla. Stat. § 559.55, et seq. Plaintiff further alleges that I.C. System’s actions constituted an invasion of his privacy.
Se…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hickson Corp. v. Northern Crossarm Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- David L. Morrison v. Amway Corporation, N.K.A. Alticor, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Magic Carpet Aviation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Hawthorne v. Mac Adjustment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. McCarsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rush v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Watts v. City of HollywoodDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Marseglia v. JP Morgan Chase BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Clemen v. Surterra Holdings, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2024
- Doe v. Predator Catchers, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.