Legal Opinion
People v. Pease
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 25, 1966No. Crim. No. 5190; Crim. No. 5191PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.
These are appeals in two separate cases. In 1 Grim. 5190 defendants Ethel Pease, James B. Valentine and Manuel B. Mattos were charged in an information with possession of a narcotic (percodan). (Health & Saf. Code, § 11500.) Their motion to set aside the information was granted (Pen. Code, § 995)1 and the People appeal. In 1 Crim. 5191 defendant Ethel Pease alone was charged in an information with two counts of receiving stolen property (§496). Her motion to set aside the information was granted (§ 995) and the People appeal. All of the offenses were charged as having been committed on…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Remers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.