Legal Opinion

Mandel v. Hutchinson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1974No. 72-1362PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

494 F.2d 364

Leonard Howard MANDEL, Individually and on behalf of all

others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Donald J. HUTCHINSON, Assessor, Alameda County, and the

Assessors and Tax Collectors of each of the other

fifty-eight Counties of the State of

California, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 72-1362.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 29, 1974.

Irachmil B. Taus, II (argued), Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

James Dexter Clark, Deputy County Counsel (argued), John D. Maharg, County Counsel, Douglas V. Hart, Deputy County Counsel, Los Angeles, Cal., for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Capitol Industries-EMI, Inc. v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Gilbert Hyatt v. Betty YeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Lowe v. Washoe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Wood v. SargeantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API