Legal Opinion
Rosania v. Taco Bell of America, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 23, 2004No. 3:03 CV 7525PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s partial motion to dismiss Plaintiffs negligence and certain damages claims (Doc. No. 10); and Plaintiffs motion for leave to file amended complaint (Doc. No. 21) as to which Defendant has filed an opposition (Doc. No. 22) and Plaintiff has filed a reply (Doc. No. 23).
The Court has jurisdiction to decide this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 29 U.S.C. § 2617(a)(2). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s partial motion to dismiss Plaintiffs negligence and certain damages claims will be granted. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sandra Humenny v. Genex Corporation, Inc. Carol ValenticCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Hayduk v. City of JohnstownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Hartman v. Asset Acceptance Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
- Smith v. GradyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Cruz v. Don Pancho Market, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.