Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Board of Appeals

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1938PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAldrich, J.

Upon notice to the respondents, the board of zoning appeals of the village of Piermont in Rockland county, and Carmine Pagnozzi and wife, in accordance with article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, as amended, the petitioner, James Stanley, applied at a Special Term held in Rockland county on June 20, 1938, upon the petition' and notice of motion, for a corrective order that a decision of the board of appeals be reviewed and corrected on the merits, such decision reversed and the order set aside and for other relief. Upon the return of the application the respondents raised an objection to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hunzicker v. PulliamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co v. LaimbeerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Albany Builders' Supply Co. v. Eastern Bridge & Structural Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Meridian National Bank v. Hoyt & Bros.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Claim of Cheesman v. CheesmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Malott v. RandallWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. DGHI, ENTERPRISES v. Pacific Cities, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Lambert v. KelleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  4. Sherman v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. McCartney v. Incorporated Village of East WillistonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API